Senator McCarthy, who ironically looks like Joseph McCarthy's wet dream (Ol' Jumpin Joe was a gay man so far in the closet he actually could critique the leather shoes), doesn't even know her own legislation!
Isn't it time that the people got rid of her? For Allah's sake, the dumb cunt doesn't even know what she's talking about.
Also, can someone please enligthen me as to what is the "thing that goes on the shoulder and folds up"? I'm thinking folding up like a grenade sight but I have yet to imagine a stock doing that.
Thursday, April 19, 2007
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
All the countries bitching about "lax" gun control in America can....
and 
you bunch of
Honestly, we don't give a flying hunk of shit what half the world (which we helped save in WWII with....GUNS!!!) has to say about American Gun laws. Personally there is only one law: Nature's Law! It is portrayed in the Bill of Rights with these awesome words:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. "
All you fucktard smelly, backwards, inferior countries who keep bitching about us having guns. Kiss my brown ass! Just because you people are virtual slaves to your government, doesn't mean we have to be. Sorry we saved your asses from the Nazis (with whom you ironically agree with on gun control) but now I think we should stay out of the whole global scene. You guys can go around shoving your fists up each others' asses, we will do something important. Like eat beef jerky and be pirates!
Would banning more guns really have stopped the killing?
As the world has watched in horror, grief, and disbelief at the sad news. A lone gunman, armed with two pistols and a lot of rage, guns down 33 people before taking his life. Before the blood from victims (may they rest in peace, and may their families find some as well) dried, the debate turned to gun control. As usual it wasn't our side that shot off their mouths first, it was the Brady Campaign, the New York Times (which lines my bird cage to help saturate it with more of its shit), and every liberal hippie out there.
Their demands for more gun control are amusing. After all, if criminals don't have guns, they won't commit crimes! After the UK banned private citizens from owning arms as one of their fundamental rights, their crime rate is non-existent, right?
WRONG!!!!
England has a pretty bad crime rate, not to mention their version of Justice is anything but. Defend yourself from thugs, hooligans, and punks, go to jail. Like this old woman who barely touched a 15-year-old punk. Self-Defense is definitely not a part of the "progressive" British culture. But hey, they have a better solution than all those icky gross guns, after all jumping up and down will take a bite out of crime!
Honestly people, do you really think banning guns is going to prevent crime? No one remembers the event about 5 years ago in Virginia where a gunman was subdued by armed law-abiding citizens? It's amusing because the media leaves out the "minor" detail about the people having their firearms and merely tackling an armed man. RIIIIIIIGGGHTTT!!! It's an easy mistake when you hate guns and freedom.
It is a sad event that went down, it's horrible people are dead from such a senseless act. It should not happen, but it does. The real way to prevent it is to allow people to carry concealed with no licenses and no restrictions. I will guarantee that crime rates will plummet quite noticeably. If not, I will personally destroy my collection and become a Brady whore.
Their demands for more gun control are amusing. After all, if criminals don't have guns, they won't commit crimes! After the UK banned private citizens from owning arms as one of their fundamental rights, their crime rate is non-existent, right?
WRONG!!!!
England has a pretty bad crime rate, not to mention their version of Justice is anything but. Defend yourself from thugs, hooligans, and punks, go to jail. Like this old woman who barely touched a 15-year-old punk. Self-Defense is definitely not a part of the "progressive" British culture. But hey, they have a better solution than all those icky gross guns, after all jumping up and down will take a bite out of crime!
Honestly people, do you really think banning guns is going to prevent crime? No one remembers the event about 5 years ago in Virginia where a gunman was subdued by armed law-abiding citizens? It's amusing because the media leaves out the "minor" detail about the people having their firearms and merely tackling an armed man. RIIIIIIIGGGHTTT!!! It's an easy mistake when you hate guns and freedom.
It is a sad event that went down, it's horrible people are dead from such a senseless act. It should not happen, but it does. The real way to prevent it is to allow people to carry concealed with no licenses and no restrictions. I will guarantee that crime rates will plummet quite noticeably. If not, I will personally destroy my collection and become a Brady whore.
Monday, April 16, 2007
Sundown at Coffin Rock
by Raymond K. Paden
(NOTE: This story can be found here.)
The old man walked slowly through the dry, fallen leaves of autumn, his practiced eye automatically choosing the bare and stony places in the trail for his feet. There was scarcely a sound as he passed, though his left knee was stiff with scar tissue. He grunted occasionally as the tight sinews pulled. Damn chainsaw, he thought.
Behind him, the boy shuffled along, trying to imitate his grandfather, but unable to mimic the silent motion that the old man had learned during countless winter days upon this wooded mountain in pursuit of game. He's fifteen years old, the old man thought. Plenty old enough to be learning. But that was another time, another America. His mind drifted, and he saw himself, a fifteen-year-old boy following in the footsteps of his own grandfather, clutching a twelve gauge in his trembling hands as they tracked a wounded whitetail.
The leg was hurting worse now, and he slowed his pace a bit. Plenty of time. It should have been my own son here with me now, the old man thought sadly. But Jason had no interest, no understanding. He cared for nothing but pounding on the keys of that damned computer terminal. He knew nothing about the woods, or where food came from...or freedom. And that's my fault, isn't it?
The old man stopped and held up his hand, motioning for the boy to look. In the small clearing ahead, the deer stood motionless, watching them. It was a scraggly buck, underfed and sickly, but the boy's eyes lit up with excitement. It had been many years since they had seen even a single whitetail here on the mountain. After the hunting had stopped, the population had exploded. The deer had eaten the mountain almost bare until erosion had become a serious problem in some places. That following winter, three starving does had wandered into the old man's yard, trying to eat the bark off of his pecan trees, and he had wished the "animal rights" fanatics could have been there then. It was against the law, but old man knew a higher law, and he took an axe into the yard and killed the starving beasts. They did not have the strength to run.
The buck finally turned and loped away, and they continued down the trail to the river. When they came to the "Big Oak," the old man turned and pushed through the heavy brush beside the trail and the boy followed, wordlessly. The old man knew that Thomas was curious about their leaving the trail, but the boy had learned to move silently (well, almost) and that meant no talking. When they came to "Coffin Rock," the old man sat down upon it and motioned for the boy to join him.
"You see this rock, shaped like a casket?" the old man asked. "Yes sir." The old man smiled. The boy was respectful and polite. He loved the outdoors, too. Everything a man could ask in a grandson ....or a son.
"I want you to remember this place, and what I'm about to tell you. A lot of it isn't going to make any sense to you, but it's important and one day you'll understand it well enough. The old man paused. Now that he was here, he didn't really know where to start.
"Before you were born," he began at last, "this country was different. I've told you about hunting, about how everybody who obeyed the law could own guns. A man could speak out, anywhere, without worrying about whether he'd get back home or not. School was different, too. A man could send his kids to a church school, or a private school, or even teach them at home. But even in the public schools, they didn't spend all their time trying to brainwash you like they do at yours now." The old man paused, and was silent for many minutes. The boy was still, watching a chipmunk scavenging beside a fallen tree below them.
"Things don't ever happen all at once, boy. They just sort of sneak up on you. Sure, we knew guns were important; we just didn't think it would ever happen in America. But we had to do something about crime, they said. It was a crisis. Everything was a crisis! It was a drug crisis, or a terrorism crisis, or street crime, or gang crime. Even a 'health care' crisis was an excuse to take away a little more of our rights." The old man turned to look at his grandson.
"They ever let you read a thing called the Constitution down there at your school?" The boy solemnly shook his head. "Well, the Fourth Amendment's still in there. It says there won't be any unreasonable searches and seizures. It says you're safe in your own home." The old man shrugged. "That had to go. It was a crisis! They could kick your door open any time, day or night, and come in with guns blazing if they thought you had drugs ...or later, guns. Oh, at first it was just registration -- to keep the guns out of the hands of criminals! But that didn't work, of course, and then later when they wanted to take 'em they knew where to look. They banned 'assault rifles', and then 'sniper rifles', and 'Saturday night specials.' Everything you saw on the TV or in the movies was against us. God knows the news people were! And the schools were teaching our kids that nobody needed guns anymore. We tried to take a stand, but we felt like the whole face of our country had changed and we were left outside."
"Me and a friend of mine, when we saw what was happening, we came and built a secret place up here on the mountain. A place where we could put our guns until we needed them. We figured some day Americans would remember what it was like to be free, and what kind of price we had to pay for that freedom. So we hid our guns instead of losing them."
"One fellow I knew disagreed. He said we ought to use our guns now and stand up to the government. Said that the colonists had fought for their freedom when the British tried to disarm them at Lexington and Concord. Well, he and a lot of others died in what your history books call the 'Tax Revolt of 1998,' but son, it wasn't the revolt that caused the repeal of the Second Amendment like your history book says. The Second Amendment was already gone long before they ever repealed it. The rest of us thought we were doing the right thing by waiting. I hope to God we were right."
"You see, Thomas. It isn't government that makes a man free. In the end, governments always do just the opposite. They gobble up freedom like hungry pigs. You have to have laws to keep the worst in men under control, but at the same time the people have to have guns, too, in order to keep the government itself under control. In our country, the people were supposed to be the final authority of the law, but that was a long time ago. Once the guns were gone, there was no reason for those who run the government to give a damn about laws and constitutional rights and such. They just did what they pleased and anyone who spoke out...well, I'm getting ahead of myself."
"It took a long time to collect up all the millions of firearms that were in private hands. The government created a whole new agency to see to it. There were rewards for turning your friends in, too. Drug dealers and murderers were set free after two or three years in prison, but possession of a gun would get you mandatory life behind bars with no parole.
"I don't know how they found out about me, probably knew I'd been a hunter all those years, or maybe somebody turned me in. They picked me up on suspicion and took me down to the federal building."
"Son, those guys did everything they could think of to me. Kept me locked up in this little room for hours, no food, no water. They kept coming in, asking me where the guns were. 'What guns?' I said. Whenever I'd doze off, they'd come crashing in, yelling and hollering. I got to where I didn't know which end was up. I'd say I wanted my lawyer and they'd laugh. 'Lawyers are for criminals', they said. 'You'll get a lawyer after we get the guns.' What's so funny is, I know they thought they were doing the right thing. They were fighting crime!"
"When I got home I found Ruth sitting in the middle of the living room floor, crying her eyes out. The house was a shambles. While I was down there, they'd come out and took our house apart. Didn't need a search warrant, they said. National emergency! Gun crisis! Your grandma tried to call our preacher and they ripped the phone off the wall. Told her that they'd go easy on me if she just told them where I kept my guns." The old man laughed. "She told them to go to hell." He stared into the distance for a moment as his laughter faded.
"They wouldn't tell her about me, where I was or anything, that whole time. She said that she'd thought I was dead. She never got over that day, and she died the next December."
"They've been watching me ever since, off and on. I guess there's not much for them to do anymore, now that all the guns are gone. Plenty of time to watch one foolish old man." He paused. Beside him, the boy stared at the stone beneath his feet.
"Anyway, I figure that, one day, America will come to her senses. Our men will need those guns and they'll be ready. We cleaned them and sealed them up good; they'll last for years. Maybe it won't be in your lifetime, Thomas. Maybe one day you'll be sitting here with your son or grandson. Tell him about me, boy. Tell him about the way I said America used to be." The old man stood, his bad leg shaking unsteadily beneath him.
"You see the way this stone points? You follow that line one hundred feet down the hill and you'll find a big round rock. It looks like it's buried solid, but one man with a good prybar can lift it, and there's a concrete tunnel right under there that goes back into the hill."
The old man stood, watching as the sun eased toward the ridge, coloring the sky and the world red. Below them, the river still splashed among the stones, as it had for a million years. It's still going, the old man thought. There'll be someone left to carry on for me when I'm gone. It was harder to walk back. He felt old and purposeless now, and it would be easier, he knew, to give in to that aching heaviness in his left lung that had begun to trouble him more and more. Damn cigarettes, he thought. His leg hurt, and the boy silently came up beside him and supported him as they started down the last mile toward the house. How quiet he walks, the old man thought. He's learned well.
It was almost dark when the boy walked in. His father looked up from his paper. "Did you and your granddad have a nice walk?"
"Yes," the boy answered, opening the refrigerator. "You can call Agent Goodwin tomorrow. Gramps finally showed me where it is."
(NOTE: This story can be found here.)
The old man walked slowly through the dry, fallen leaves of autumn, his practiced eye automatically choosing the bare and stony places in the trail for his feet. There was scarcely a sound as he passed, though his left knee was stiff with scar tissue. He grunted occasionally as the tight sinews pulled. Damn chainsaw, he thought.
Behind him, the boy shuffled along, trying to imitate his grandfather, but unable to mimic the silent motion that the old man had learned during countless winter days upon this wooded mountain in pursuit of game. He's fifteen years old, the old man thought. Plenty old enough to be learning. But that was another time, another America. His mind drifted, and he saw himself, a fifteen-year-old boy following in the footsteps of his own grandfather, clutching a twelve gauge in his trembling hands as they tracked a wounded whitetail.
The leg was hurting worse now, and he slowed his pace a bit. Plenty of time. It should have been my own son here with me now, the old man thought sadly. But Jason had no interest, no understanding. He cared for nothing but pounding on the keys of that damned computer terminal. He knew nothing about the woods, or where food came from...or freedom. And that's my fault, isn't it?
The old man stopped and held up his hand, motioning for the boy to look. In the small clearing ahead, the deer stood motionless, watching them. It was a scraggly buck, underfed and sickly, but the boy's eyes lit up with excitement. It had been many years since they had seen even a single whitetail here on the mountain. After the hunting had stopped, the population had exploded. The deer had eaten the mountain almost bare until erosion had become a serious problem in some places. That following winter, three starving does had wandered into the old man's yard, trying to eat the bark off of his pecan trees, and he had wished the "animal rights" fanatics could have been there then. It was against the law, but old man knew a higher law, and he took an axe into the yard and killed the starving beasts. They did not have the strength to run.
The buck finally turned and loped away, and they continued down the trail to the river. When they came to the "Big Oak," the old man turned and pushed through the heavy brush beside the trail and the boy followed, wordlessly. The old man knew that Thomas was curious about their leaving the trail, but the boy had learned to move silently (well, almost) and that meant no talking. When they came to "Coffin Rock," the old man sat down upon it and motioned for the boy to join him.
"You see this rock, shaped like a casket?" the old man asked. "Yes sir." The old man smiled. The boy was respectful and polite. He loved the outdoors, too. Everything a man could ask in a grandson ....or a son.
"I want you to remember this place, and what I'm about to tell you. A lot of it isn't going to make any sense to you, but it's important and one day you'll understand it well enough. The old man paused. Now that he was here, he didn't really know where to start.
"Before you were born," he began at last, "this country was different. I've told you about hunting, about how everybody who obeyed the law could own guns. A man could speak out, anywhere, without worrying about whether he'd get back home or not. School was different, too. A man could send his kids to a church school, or a private school, or even teach them at home. But even in the public schools, they didn't spend all their time trying to brainwash you like they do at yours now." The old man paused, and was silent for many minutes. The boy was still, watching a chipmunk scavenging beside a fallen tree below them.
"Things don't ever happen all at once, boy. They just sort of sneak up on you. Sure, we knew guns were important; we just didn't think it would ever happen in America. But we had to do something about crime, they said. It was a crisis. Everything was a crisis! It was a drug crisis, or a terrorism crisis, or street crime, or gang crime. Even a 'health care' crisis was an excuse to take away a little more of our rights." The old man turned to look at his grandson.
"They ever let you read a thing called the Constitution down there at your school?" The boy solemnly shook his head. "Well, the Fourth Amendment's still in there. It says there won't be any unreasonable searches and seizures. It says you're safe in your own home." The old man shrugged. "That had to go. It was a crisis! They could kick your door open any time, day or night, and come in with guns blazing if they thought you had drugs ...or later, guns. Oh, at first it was just registration -- to keep the guns out of the hands of criminals! But that didn't work, of course, and then later when they wanted to take 'em they knew where to look. They banned 'assault rifles', and then 'sniper rifles', and 'Saturday night specials.' Everything you saw on the TV or in the movies was against us. God knows the news people were! And the schools were teaching our kids that nobody needed guns anymore. We tried to take a stand, but we felt like the whole face of our country had changed and we were left outside."
"Me and a friend of mine, when we saw what was happening, we came and built a secret place up here on the mountain. A place where we could put our guns until we needed them. We figured some day Americans would remember what it was like to be free, and what kind of price we had to pay for that freedom. So we hid our guns instead of losing them."
"One fellow I knew disagreed. He said we ought to use our guns now and stand up to the government. Said that the colonists had fought for their freedom when the British tried to disarm them at Lexington and Concord. Well, he and a lot of others died in what your history books call the 'Tax Revolt of 1998,' but son, it wasn't the revolt that caused the repeal of the Second Amendment like your history book says. The Second Amendment was already gone long before they ever repealed it. The rest of us thought we were doing the right thing by waiting. I hope to God we were right."
"You see, Thomas. It isn't government that makes a man free. In the end, governments always do just the opposite. They gobble up freedom like hungry pigs. You have to have laws to keep the worst in men under control, but at the same time the people have to have guns, too, in order to keep the government itself under control. In our country, the people were supposed to be the final authority of the law, but that was a long time ago. Once the guns were gone, there was no reason for those who run the government to give a damn about laws and constitutional rights and such. They just did what they pleased and anyone who spoke out...well, I'm getting ahead of myself."
"It took a long time to collect up all the millions of firearms that were in private hands. The government created a whole new agency to see to it. There were rewards for turning your friends in, too. Drug dealers and murderers were set free after two or three years in prison, but possession of a gun would get you mandatory life behind bars with no parole.
"I don't know how they found out about me, probably knew I'd been a hunter all those years, or maybe somebody turned me in. They picked me up on suspicion and took me down to the federal building."
"Son, those guys did everything they could think of to me. Kept me locked up in this little room for hours, no food, no water. They kept coming in, asking me where the guns were. 'What guns?' I said. Whenever I'd doze off, they'd come crashing in, yelling and hollering. I got to where I didn't know which end was up. I'd say I wanted my lawyer and they'd laugh. 'Lawyers are for criminals', they said. 'You'll get a lawyer after we get the guns.' What's so funny is, I know they thought they were doing the right thing. They were fighting crime!"
"When I got home I found Ruth sitting in the middle of the living room floor, crying her eyes out. The house was a shambles. While I was down there, they'd come out and took our house apart. Didn't need a search warrant, they said. National emergency! Gun crisis! Your grandma tried to call our preacher and they ripped the phone off the wall. Told her that they'd go easy on me if she just told them where I kept my guns." The old man laughed. "She told them to go to hell." He stared into the distance for a moment as his laughter faded.
"They wouldn't tell her about me, where I was or anything, that whole time. She said that she'd thought I was dead. She never got over that day, and she died the next December."
"They've been watching me ever since, off and on. I guess there's not much for them to do anymore, now that all the guns are gone. Plenty of time to watch one foolish old man." He paused. Beside him, the boy stared at the stone beneath his feet.
"Anyway, I figure that, one day, America will come to her senses. Our men will need those guns and they'll be ready. We cleaned them and sealed them up good; they'll last for years. Maybe it won't be in your lifetime, Thomas. Maybe one day you'll be sitting here with your son or grandson. Tell him about me, boy. Tell him about the way I said America used to be." The old man stood, his bad leg shaking unsteadily beneath him.
"You see the way this stone points? You follow that line one hundred feet down the hill and you'll find a big round rock. It looks like it's buried solid, but one man with a good prybar can lift it, and there's a concrete tunnel right under there that goes back into the hill."
The old man stood, watching as the sun eased toward the ridge, coloring the sky and the world red. Below them, the river still splashed among the stones, as it had for a million years. It's still going, the old man thought. There'll be someone left to carry on for me when I'm gone. It was harder to walk back. He felt old and purposeless now, and it would be easier, he knew, to give in to that aching heaviness in his left lung that had begun to trouble him more and more. Damn cigarettes, he thought. His leg hurt, and the boy silently came up beside him and supported him as they started down the last mile toward the house. How quiet he walks, the old man thought. He's learned well.
It was almost dark when the boy walked in. His father looked up from his paper. "Did you and your granddad have a nice walk?"
"Yes," the boy answered, opening the refrigerator. "You can call Agent Goodwin tomorrow. Gramps finally showed me where it is."
Monday, April 9, 2007
Ah, so here we go again.
Q: What is the only difference between these two?
A: One of them is SUPPOSED to look and sound like a man!
It's interesting to note the amazing similiarities between these two men. Hillary (who curiously refers to himself as a woman) hates guns in citizens' hands, much like Hitler did. Hillary constantly uses brute tactics to win, as did Hitler. Both love preventing free speech, thought, and anything that went against their agenda. The only difference is Hillary has yet to fulfill his wet dream of killing all political opponents after disarming them like Hitler did.
Hillary thinks he will get the office, he couldn't be more wrong. Even if they ban my guns, I will chuckle, shake my head, and get my guns loaded for when the goons come to fulfill Hitl...I mean Hillary's Final Solution.
Ah, this picture is much more accurate:
Soon, they will take away your guns, give you a nice number tattoo on your left forearm, and put you on a cattle car heading to some "re-education" on why you are a bad citizens for wanting your human rights.
Fuck Hillary, fuck him up his stupid ass.
One day it may come to this:
So stock up now so we can all say with ease:
Do the right thing, join the JPFO today!
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
Fuck Penguins!!!
I'm seriously tired of all these fucking penguin movies like Farce of the Penguins (I'll divulge on this later), Madagascar, March of the Penguins, and Happy Feet? You know what else means "happy''? GAY!!!! That's right, it really is about gay penguins having gay buttsex on some gay tundra full of gay cowboys eating pudding. Honestly, Gay Cowboys? Did the guy who wrote that movie just decide to emulate the Village People when he smoked his bowl of the chronic and cranked out that crappy movie.
Or what about 300? That movie sucked! I actually walked out of the theater bored to death. The battle scene was all CGI, the fighting was as well, and the actors were pathetic. 300, Happy Feet, Spanglish, etc. All of these movies suck!!!
What's worse, people swoon over these movies and shit saying how great the special effects are. Newsflash you idiots, we don't care about how fancy the wall paper of some simulated room looks like if the characters are awkward and one-dimensional, or when the plot has holes big enough to let a Union Pacific go through.
Now about these Movie movies such as Scary Movie, Date Movie, Epic Movie, Teen Movie, etc. THEY'RE NO FUCKING FUNNY! Christ the chicks in there are somewhat hot but that's about it. Let the idea die. All the people who are buying tickets for these abominations should be cut with a rusty razor blade and then have gasoline and salt poured on their wounds. That'll teach them to help endorse such stupid movies.
Not to mention the movies that were actually good like Indiana Jones, Rocky, Rambo, Die Hard, etc. are now getting sequels well after the actors are past their prime to be in these movies. Hell Stallone and Ford were already climbing up there in years when they starred in their respective films. Let it be treasured in our childhood memories of watching these movies instead of whoring them out to a director who has no idea what the fuck he is doing.
All these shitty movies make me feel like this:
Blasphemous? Damn straight? Religious? FUCK NO!
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Lloyd Bridges for President!!!!
There's been a lot of talk these days about who should run for the "prestige" of being the President. Personally I think the most qualified person is Lloyd Bridges. He has a great last name, he's an actor, and he is sooooo dreamy. I think Madonna gave her endorsement for him (which, as we all know, is what makes or breaks a candidate!) and she is so on the ball. Like that one time when she discovered her latent British accent and impressed everyone with her command of such knowledge. Or how about that time she starred in all of those great movies that were blockbusters and critically acclaimed. Such timeless classics as Swept Away, Eva, and Stupid Old Bitch Who Can't Act Stars in Some Shitty Remake of a Shitty Movie because Her Husband is Fucking Her Sub-Par Vagina and Can't Stand Up for Himself.
So remember informed voter, vote for Lloyd Bridges.
OR ELSE!!!
So remember informed voter, vote for Lloyd Bridges.
OR ELSE!!!
Saturday, March 17, 2007
ISPU is an apt acronym! (It really makes me want to say "Pee-uw!")
Checking out the great group of the Jews For the Preservation of Firearms Ownership I stumbled across this little gem that they posted. Apparently the ISPU (Institute for Social Policy and Understanding) has smeared gun owners and 2nd Amendment supporters as "Neo-Nazis" in this article. I'm going to go point by point and ridicule their wrong-headed position.
(NOTE: the text is red for the bullshit.)
"The idea of terrorist cells operating clandestinely in the United States, quietly amassing handguns and assault rifles, and planning suicide shooting rampages in our malls, is right out of Tom Clancy’s most recent novel. If not for the fact that the 9/11 attacks were also foreshadowed in a Clancy novel, I would have given the idea no further thought."
Very good, so you're not a bloodthirsty maniac. Neither are most gun owners because we obey the law quite well. I always find it amusing when people claim the guns cause people to do bad things.
I remember one guy yelled at me because a kid he knew blew his brains out with his dad's revolver. The kid would have done it anyway, had there been no gun. He could have easily jumped off a bridge, strangled himself, picked a fight with a big biker, had sex with Rosie O'Donnell, etc. The gun did not magically call out to him to use it to blow his brains out. The young man was disturbed and needed help. But I digress
Criminals scoff at gun laws because what is going to stop a murderer: a guy ready to defend himself with a gun or a gun law saying "No-No, that's illegal!". Doesn't take a rocket surgeon or a brain scientist to figure that one out.
"This leads to a bigger policy issue. In the post 9/11 world where supposedly “everything has changed,” perhaps it is time for Americans to reconsider the value of public gun ownership. "
You're right on that one. We should reconsider how much of our rights have been taken away. The government has no business knowing what I am doing unless I am doing something overtly illegal. If I own several rifles that are "assault" rifles, then it's my own damn business until I do something bad like shoot a bunch of people. Ask people who own AR-15's, AK-47's, G3's, etc. how many people they have killed and you'll be in for a shock: almost none. Back to this fun adventure in hyperbole.
"The idea of public gun ownership simply does not make sense anymore. The right to bear arms, as enumerated in the Second Amendment, was meant for the maintenance of a “well-regulated militia.” At the time the amendment was adopted, standing armies were viewed with a great deal of suspicion, and therefore, gun-owning individuals were seen as a protection mechanism for the public. These gun owners were also seen as guardians of the republic against the tyranny of the rulers. The framers of the Constitution saw the right to bear and use arms as a check against an unruly government. That state of affairs no longer exists."
Actually it's alive and kicking. The Founding Fathers (whom you have decided to drag into your shit fest like a little daddy's whore) would be at odds with such an apathetic view. WE SHOULD NEVER TRUST THE GOVERNMENT, ANY GOVERNMENT, NO MATTER WHAT PROMISES IT MAKES!
As Thomas Jefferson once said: "Government big enough to provide you with all you need is also big enough to take everything you have."
And who can forget this pearl of wisdom: "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms. "
Or this wonderful classic: "What signify a few lives lost in a generation or two? The tree of liberty must from time to time be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
But let's get back to this hilarious tragedy:
"Today, only a handful of citizens outside of neo-Nazi and white supremacist goups (Note: They spelled 'groups' wrong) view gun ownership as a means of keeping the government in check. Even those citizens who continue to maintain such antiquated views must face the reality that the United States’ armed forces are too large and too powerful for the citizenry to make much difference. Quite frankly, the idea of the citizenry rising up against the U.S. government with their handguns and assault rifles, and facing the military with these personal arms is absurd. The Branch Davidian tragedy at Waco, Texas, was one such futile attempt."
Gun control advocates love using Waco as a way to sneer: "See, you can't stop the government." Actually we can if push came to shove. The Bolsheviks overthrew the Czar and his ministers by having an armed populace who grew tired of being neglected. Ever wonder why after that so many countries adopted gun control? The rulers realized that WE THE PEOPLE do not tolerate crap for too long if given the chance to make them pay for it in the shorts.
Or what about the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising where the brave Jews fought valiantly against one of the most evil men to walk this Earth? They did not go silently into the night. If every law-abiding citizen had a rifle, a handgun, and plenty of ammo, we would outnumber the military and police by at least 10 to 1. That's a conservative figure. Only about 1% of the population is in the military and most of those are not infantry units so their abilities with weapons is questionable.
Not to mention that most soldiers would refuse such an illegal action. We have to remember we are talking about our sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, uncles, aunts, cousins, brothers, sisters, and friends turning on their family for the "sake of security". They would rather turn their rifles on the tyrants than on the patriots.
And if not, which I highly doubt, we who love freedom shall not go quietly. WE MAY DIE FIGHTING BUT IT IS BETTER TO DIE STANDING AS A FREE MAN DEFENDING FREEDOM THAN LIVE KNEELING AS A SLAVE BEGGING FOR THE MORSELS OF IT!!!
Let's hear some more of this great bullshit:
"The more important consideration is public safety. It is no longer safe for the public to carry guns. Gun violence is increasingly widespread in the United States. According to the DOJ/FBI’s Crime In The United States: 2003 report, 45,197 people in the United States were murdered with guns between 1999 and 2003. That averages out to more than 9,000 people murdered per year. Nearly three times the number of lives lost in the tragic 9/11 attacks are murdered annually as a direct result of guns."
The first resort of a bullshitter is quoting statistics. How do we know those victims were not criminals who were stopped by an honest citizen? It is quite safe to carry in public. Places that have adopted such legislation are quite impressed at how well concealed carry goes over. Why?
Because criminals do not get licenses to carry. They break the law anyway, what does it matter if they violate a silly gun law? But if you have armed citizens who love the law and obey it, you have a major deterrent to criminals running amok. Even if only a third of the people allowed to carry did so, it leaves a chance that the average mugger may not want to risk it.
THUGS AND TYRANTS ARE COWARDS AT HEART!!!
These morons then go on to quote crimes that were committed by extremists and seem to want to pass it off as all gun owners are only a hair breadth away from going trigger happy on the nearest playground:
"Examples of wanton violence are all around. One particularly heinous incident of gun violence occurred in 1998 when former Aryan Nation member Buford Furrow shot and wounded three young boys, a teenage girl and a receptionist at the North Valley Jewish Community Center in Los Angeles and then shot and killed a Filipino-American postal worker.
Another occurred in July 1999 when white supremacist Benjamin Nathaniel Smith, a member of the World Church of the Creator, went on a weekend shooting spree, targeting Blacks, Jews and Asians. By the time Smith was done he had wounded six Orthodox Jews returning from services, and killed one African-American and one Korean-American.
Just recently, in Ulster, NY, a 24 year old man carrying a Hesse Arms Model 47, an AK-47 clone assault rifle, randomly shot people in a local mall. While the Justice Department did not label this murder a terrorist attack, all the signs were there. The Ulster, New York shooting is an ominous warning of what lies ahead. Terrorism can be a homegrown act committed by anyone with a gun and is not unique to a “Middle Eastern-looking man with a bomb.” As long as the public is allowed to own guns, the threat of similar terrorist attacks remains real."
Make no mistake, these are tragic events. These things should not happen but they do, regardless of what kind of laws you make. Murderers still commit murder, rapists rape, muggers mug. It's a sad fact of life. YOU ARE NEVER GUARANTEED SAFETY! Even at home you could be robbed. It's sad but it's true. There is no easy ride in life.
Then probably one of the most heinous things they could have said comes up:
"The idea of curtailing rights in the name of homeland security does not seem implausible given the current state of civil liberties in the United States. The war on terror has already taken an enormous toll on the First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, and thus far, very few Americans have objected. In light of this precedence, it seems reasonable that scaling back or even repealing the right to bear arms would be an easy task."
This is just disgusting. Just because few people object does not make something right. Few people objected to extermination of Jews, Slavs, Mentally Handicap, etc. for a while and that did not make millions of lives lost "okay".
The Nazis used the idea of homeland security to strip people of their rights. As the JPFO and others say, NEVER AGAIN!
Please, good reader, keep on:
"In fact, it will be a very difficult task. So far the civil liberties curtailment has affected generally disenfranchised groups such as immigrants, people of color and religious minorities. An assault on the Second Amendment will impact a much more powerful constituency.
According to the DOJ’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2002 41 percent of American households owned at least one gun. According to these same statistics, 50 percent of the owners were male, 43 percent were white and 48 percent were Republican. More than 50 percent of the gun owners were college educated and earned more than $50,000 per year. Regrettably, these folks are going to marshal their considerable resources to protect their special interest.
This is a shame. Instead of laying waste to the civil rights and civil liberties that are at the core of free society, and rather than squandering precious time and money on amending the U.S. Constitution for such things as “preserving marriage between a man and woman,” the nation ought to focus its attention on the havoc guns cause in society and debate the merits of gun ownership in this era of terrorism."
It will be a very difficult task at least in my home. When the Gestapo comes to my door knocking and saying, "Hand over your guns, comrade." I'll simply smile, and make my AK-47 (whom I have named Ivana) do my talking. She's loud, she kicks, and when she hits you, you don't have a nice day.
The turd baskets finish off with this pathetic appeal to emotion:
"So long as guns remain available to the general public, there will always be the threat of terrorists walking into a crowded restaurant, a busy coffee shop or a packed movie theater and opening fire upon unsuspecting civilians.
The Second Amendment is not worth such risks."
There will be a threat regardless of what laws are passed. The Second Amendment is worth the risks. It is worth our Bill of Rights. Without it, all that the BOR is merely a piece of paper with fancy writing on it.
In closing, good reader:
Gun owners, not the military (though I do support such brave men and women) nor the police nor any government agent, are the true defenders of our freedom. The military has gone bad before, both in this wonderful land and the great country of Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Russia, and so on. The police have among their numbers corrupt, racist, bigot, unbalanced, and hateful people among their ranks (they do a hard job but they are only human). Don't even get me started on government agents.
WE THE PEOPLE are the ones who are charged to defend Liberty in all of her glory. We shall make no small burp to do so. My AK-47 does the talking when it comes to liberty. I shall hope yours does as well.
(NOTE: the text is red for the bullshit.)
"The idea of terrorist cells operating clandestinely in the United States, quietly amassing handguns and assault rifles, and planning suicide shooting rampages in our malls, is right out of Tom Clancy’s most recent novel. If not for the fact that the 9/11 attacks were also foreshadowed in a Clancy novel, I would have given the idea no further thought."
Very good, so you're not a bloodthirsty maniac. Neither are most gun owners because we obey the law quite well. I always find it amusing when people claim the guns cause people to do bad things.
I remember one guy yelled at me because a kid he knew blew his brains out with his dad's revolver. The kid would have done it anyway, had there been no gun. He could have easily jumped off a bridge, strangled himself, picked a fight with a big biker, had sex with Rosie O'Donnell, etc. The gun did not magically call out to him to use it to blow his brains out. The young man was disturbed and needed help. But I digress
Criminals scoff at gun laws because what is going to stop a murderer: a guy ready to defend himself with a gun or a gun law saying "No-No, that's illegal!". Doesn't take a rocket surgeon or a brain scientist to figure that one out.
"This leads to a bigger policy issue. In the post 9/11 world where supposedly “everything has changed,” perhaps it is time for Americans to reconsider the value of public gun ownership. "
You're right on that one. We should reconsider how much of our rights have been taken away. The government has no business knowing what I am doing unless I am doing something overtly illegal. If I own several rifles that are "assault" rifles, then it's my own damn business until I do something bad like shoot a bunch of people. Ask people who own AR-15's, AK-47's, G3's, etc. how many people they have killed and you'll be in for a shock: almost none. Back to this fun adventure in hyperbole.
"The idea of public gun ownership simply does not make sense anymore. The right to bear arms, as enumerated in the Second Amendment, was meant for the maintenance of a “well-regulated militia.” At the time the amendment was adopted, standing armies were viewed with a great deal of suspicion, and therefore, gun-owning individuals were seen as a protection mechanism for the public. These gun owners were also seen as guardians of the republic against the tyranny of the rulers. The framers of the Constitution saw the right to bear and use arms as a check against an unruly government. That state of affairs no longer exists."
Actually it's alive and kicking. The Founding Fathers (whom you have decided to drag into your shit fest like a little daddy's whore) would be at odds with such an apathetic view. WE SHOULD NEVER TRUST THE GOVERNMENT, ANY GOVERNMENT, NO MATTER WHAT PROMISES IT MAKES!
As Thomas Jefferson once said: "Government big enough to provide you with all you need is also big enough to take everything you have."
And who can forget this pearl of wisdom: "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms. "
Or this wonderful classic: "What signify a few lives lost in a generation or two? The tree of liberty must from time to time be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
But let's get back to this hilarious tragedy:
"Today, only a handful of citizens outside of neo-Nazi and white supremacist goups (Note: They spelled 'groups' wrong) view gun ownership as a means of keeping the government in check. Even those citizens who continue to maintain such antiquated views must face the reality that the United States’ armed forces are too large and too powerful for the citizenry to make much difference. Quite frankly, the idea of the citizenry rising up against the U.S. government with their handguns and assault rifles, and facing the military with these personal arms is absurd. The Branch Davidian tragedy at Waco, Texas, was one such futile attempt."
Gun control advocates love using Waco as a way to sneer: "See, you can't stop the government." Actually we can if push came to shove. The Bolsheviks overthrew the Czar and his ministers by having an armed populace who grew tired of being neglected. Ever wonder why after that so many countries adopted gun control? The rulers realized that WE THE PEOPLE do not tolerate crap for too long if given the chance to make them pay for it in the shorts.
Or what about the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising where the brave Jews fought valiantly against one of the most evil men to walk this Earth? They did not go silently into the night. If every law-abiding citizen had a rifle, a handgun, and plenty of ammo, we would outnumber the military and police by at least 10 to 1. That's a conservative figure. Only about 1% of the population is in the military and most of those are not infantry units so their abilities with weapons is questionable.
Not to mention that most soldiers would refuse such an illegal action. We have to remember we are talking about our sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, uncles, aunts, cousins, brothers, sisters, and friends turning on their family for the "sake of security". They would rather turn their rifles on the tyrants than on the patriots.
And if not, which I highly doubt, we who love freedom shall not go quietly. WE MAY DIE FIGHTING BUT IT IS BETTER TO DIE STANDING AS A FREE MAN DEFENDING FREEDOM THAN LIVE KNEELING AS A SLAVE BEGGING FOR THE MORSELS OF IT!!!
Let's hear some more of this great bullshit:
"The more important consideration is public safety. It is no longer safe for the public to carry guns. Gun violence is increasingly widespread in the United States. According to the DOJ/FBI’s Crime In The United States: 2003 report, 45,197 people in the United States were murdered with guns between 1999 and 2003. That averages out to more than 9,000 people murdered per year. Nearly three times the number of lives lost in the tragic 9/11 attacks are murdered annually as a direct result of guns."
The first resort of a bullshitter is quoting statistics. How do we know those victims were not criminals who were stopped by an honest citizen? It is quite safe to carry in public. Places that have adopted such legislation are quite impressed at how well concealed carry goes over. Why?
Because criminals do not get licenses to carry. They break the law anyway, what does it matter if they violate a silly gun law? But if you have armed citizens who love the law and obey it, you have a major deterrent to criminals running amok. Even if only a third of the people allowed to carry did so, it leaves a chance that the average mugger may not want to risk it.
THUGS AND TYRANTS ARE COWARDS AT HEART!!!
These morons then go on to quote crimes that were committed by extremists and seem to want to pass it off as all gun owners are only a hair breadth away from going trigger happy on the nearest playground:
"Examples of wanton violence are all around. One particularly heinous incident of gun violence occurred in 1998 when former Aryan Nation member Buford Furrow shot and wounded three young boys, a teenage girl and a receptionist at the North Valley Jewish Community Center in Los Angeles and then shot and killed a Filipino-American postal worker.
Another occurred in July 1999 when white supremacist Benjamin Nathaniel Smith, a member of the World Church of the Creator, went on a weekend shooting spree, targeting Blacks, Jews and Asians. By the time Smith was done he had wounded six Orthodox Jews returning from services, and killed one African-American and one Korean-American.
Just recently, in Ulster, NY, a 24 year old man carrying a Hesse Arms Model 47, an AK-47 clone assault rifle, randomly shot people in a local mall. While the Justice Department did not label this murder a terrorist attack, all the signs were there. The Ulster, New York shooting is an ominous warning of what lies ahead. Terrorism can be a homegrown act committed by anyone with a gun and is not unique to a “Middle Eastern-looking man with a bomb.” As long as the public is allowed to own guns, the threat of similar terrorist attacks remains real."
Make no mistake, these are tragic events. These things should not happen but they do, regardless of what kind of laws you make. Murderers still commit murder, rapists rape, muggers mug. It's a sad fact of life. YOU ARE NEVER GUARANTEED SAFETY! Even at home you could be robbed. It's sad but it's true. There is no easy ride in life.
Then probably one of the most heinous things they could have said comes up:
"The idea of curtailing rights in the name of homeland security does not seem implausible given the current state of civil liberties in the United States. The war on terror has already taken an enormous toll on the First, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments, and thus far, very few Americans have objected. In light of this precedence, it seems reasonable that scaling back or even repealing the right to bear arms would be an easy task."
This is just disgusting. Just because few people object does not make something right. Few people objected to extermination of Jews, Slavs, Mentally Handicap, etc. for a while and that did not make millions of lives lost "okay".
The Nazis used the idea of homeland security to strip people of their rights. As the JPFO and others say, NEVER AGAIN!
Please, good reader, keep on:
"In fact, it will be a very difficult task. So far the civil liberties curtailment has affected generally disenfranchised groups such as immigrants, people of color and religious minorities. An assault on the Second Amendment will impact a much more powerful constituency.
According to the DOJ’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2002 41 percent of American households owned at least one gun. According to these same statistics, 50 percent of the owners were male, 43 percent were white and 48 percent were Republican. More than 50 percent of the gun owners were college educated and earned more than $50,000 per year. Regrettably, these folks are going to marshal their considerable resources to protect their special interest.
This is a shame. Instead of laying waste to the civil rights and civil liberties that are at the core of free society, and rather than squandering precious time and money on amending the U.S. Constitution for such things as “preserving marriage between a man and woman,” the nation ought to focus its attention on the havoc guns cause in society and debate the merits of gun ownership in this era of terrorism."
It will be a very difficult task at least in my home. When the Gestapo comes to my door knocking and saying, "Hand over your guns, comrade." I'll simply smile, and make my AK-47 (whom I have named Ivana) do my talking. She's loud, she kicks, and when she hits you, you don't have a nice day.
The turd baskets finish off with this pathetic appeal to emotion:
"So long as guns remain available to the general public, there will always be the threat of terrorists walking into a crowded restaurant, a busy coffee shop or a packed movie theater and opening fire upon unsuspecting civilians.
The Second Amendment is not worth such risks."
There will be a threat regardless of what laws are passed. The Second Amendment is worth the risks. It is worth our Bill of Rights. Without it, all that the BOR is merely a piece of paper with fancy writing on it.
In closing, good reader:
Gun owners, not the military (though I do support such brave men and women) nor the police nor any government agent, are the true defenders of our freedom. The military has gone bad before, both in this wonderful land and the great country of Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Russia, and so on. The police have among their numbers corrupt, racist, bigot, unbalanced, and hateful people among their ranks (they do a hard job but they are only human). Don't even get me started on government agents.
WE THE PEOPLE are the ones who are charged to defend Liberty in all of her glory. We shall make no small burp to do so. My AK-47 does the talking when it comes to liberty. I shall hope yours does as well.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
A Nation of Cowards
Apathy is the first sign of a coward. Appeasement is the second one. Surrender is the clincher. It is a sad state that we as Americans are on a bullet-train to this state. We are apathetic of problems and say "Gee, not my problem!". We decide to have appeasement with those who wish to compromise our Rights to speak freely, own guns, love another consenting adult, and believe in whatever god(s) we wish in peace. Sadly we haven't reached surrendering over to others just quite yet.
People do not seem to mind that the Bill of Rights is slowly being eroded in the name of safety. Habeas Corpus is being killed because it's a "hindrance to our safety and fight against terrorists". What good is safety if there is no liberty. Who shall watch these watchmen who watch us so closely? Are we to be guilty of a crime before we even act? Uncle Sam has decided that he can see what we're reading, groups we associate with, and generally what we do in the privacy of our home. For what, you say? Safety? There is no such thing in reality. You can take all the steps to ensure you are safe but something will turn out to be your Achilles' Heel!
I remember a conversation I had with someone a while back when I scoffed (my favorite past time besides shooting paper to bits) at the PATRIOT ACT. The other person gave me a LECTURE about how we can't let "something stupid like caring about the rights of some crook" get in the way of defending people. I'm sorry but the last time I checked the Bill of Rights, "crooks" have rights to confront the evidence against them. Even after they are convicted they are still human beings who deserve dignity. It baffles the civilized mind to think that such thoughts have crept up after so many years of evolving from primitive humans.
This same person also said that all guns should be registered and that the Assault Weapon Ban should be brought back. I'm sorry but why not ban computers because they lead to people being hackers and bootlegging games, videos, books, etc.? Why not make it so cars do not have ground effects, spoilers, tinted windows, and the ability to go over 70 MPH? I honestly do not understand how people can be so afraid of guns?
Notice all the morons who go on a shooting spree with a semi-auto? How many people do they kill? Five, ten max, right? Now let's look at Charles Whitman. This guy goes up into the UT Tower, kills roughly 15 people (numbers are disputed but that's close enough, dammit!). His weapon of choice: a Remington 700 with a scope. Whitman did not spray-and-pray his attack. He was methodical, he calmly shot each person with precision of a Marine. Now here lies the question, should be ban bolt-action rifles? Should we have lobotomies for everyone who is discharged from the Armed Forces? Should we make towers so fortified that this will never (riiight, never) happen?
You roll your eyes and say, "Of course not!" but I'm sure there are people out there who would seriously consider these options (though maybe not to the same hyperbolic degree that I have presented in the latter two). Crazy people will do bad things regardless of the precautions you take.
In Soviet Russia (no this is not a Yakov Smirnoff joke, sheesh!), Andrei Chikatilo killed over 50 people. Bear in mind the USSR had gun-control and constantly monitored its people. It was the Party line to say that such crimes were only committed in countries that were under the influence of capitalism.
If we do not stand ready to defend freedom, we do not deserve it. Lip service is not needed, actions are! Act now and save your liberty!
People do not seem to mind that the Bill of Rights is slowly being eroded in the name of safety. Habeas Corpus is being killed because it's a "hindrance to our safety and fight against terrorists". What good is safety if there is no liberty. Who shall watch these watchmen who watch us so closely? Are we to be guilty of a crime before we even act? Uncle Sam has decided that he can see what we're reading, groups we associate with, and generally what we do in the privacy of our home. For what, you say? Safety? There is no such thing in reality. You can take all the steps to ensure you are safe but something will turn out to be your Achilles' Heel!
I remember a conversation I had with someone a while back when I scoffed (my favorite past time besides shooting paper to bits) at the PATRIOT ACT. The other person gave me a LECTURE about how we can't let "something stupid like caring about the rights of some crook" get in the way of defending people. I'm sorry but the last time I checked the Bill of Rights, "crooks" have rights to confront the evidence against them. Even after they are convicted they are still human beings who deserve dignity. It baffles the civilized mind to think that such thoughts have crept up after so many years of evolving from primitive humans.
This same person also said that all guns should be registered and that the Assault Weapon Ban should be brought back. I'm sorry but why not ban computers because they lead to people being hackers and bootlegging games, videos, books, etc.? Why not make it so cars do not have ground effects, spoilers, tinted windows, and the ability to go over 70 MPH? I honestly do not understand how people can be so afraid of guns?
Notice all the morons who go on a shooting spree with a semi-auto? How many people do they kill? Five, ten max, right? Now let's look at Charles Whitman. This guy goes up into the UT Tower, kills roughly 15 people (numbers are disputed but that's close enough, dammit!). His weapon of choice: a Remington 700 with a scope. Whitman did not spray-and-pray his attack. He was methodical, he calmly shot each person with precision of a Marine. Now here lies the question, should be ban bolt-action rifles? Should we have lobotomies for everyone who is discharged from the Armed Forces? Should we make towers so fortified that this will never (riiight, never) happen?
You roll your eyes and say, "Of course not!" but I'm sure there are people out there who would seriously consider these options (though maybe not to the same hyperbolic degree that I have presented in the latter two). Crazy people will do bad things regardless of the precautions you take.
In Soviet Russia (no this is not a Yakov Smirnoff joke, sheesh!), Andrei Chikatilo killed over 50 people. Bear in mind the USSR had gun-control and constantly monitored its people. It was the Party line to say that such crimes were only committed in countries that were under the influence of capitalism.
If we do not stand ready to defend freedom, we do not deserve it. Lip service is not needed, actions are! Act now and save your liberty!
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Remington's Stance On Your Freedom!
UPDATE!
Remington was smart and decided to drop Jumbo like the huge turd that he is. Please don't boycott them and anything else I said is now void because of them. Unlike Jumbo, I can accept my mistake. Move along, nothing to see here.
Remington was smart and decided to drop Jumbo like the huge turd that he is. Please don't boycott them and anything else I said is now void because of them. Unlike Jumbo, I can accept my mistake. Move along, nothing to see here.
Jim Zumbo is a Jumbo Dumbo
Recently Jim Zumbo, a name which was unheard to me until now, came out and said some nasty things about "assault rifles" and how "terrifying" they are. Jim is sponsored by Remington, Gerber, and Mossy Oak to name a few. I can foresee that he may be in the unemployment line due to the mounting criticism and anger directed towards Outdoor Life and the fact subscriptions are being cancelled (I'm not even going to bother patronizing their site save for finding more ammo to ridicule their writer) and harsh (but needed) words are being said.
Jumbo is my nickname for the portly hunter who probably makes more than I do in a year for each of his blathering. It's easy to criticize the working American like me who prefers such weapons when they are cheaper, more reliable, versatile, ergonomic, etc. compared to some expensive bolt-action that can't be jarred to hard. Jumbo sure likes things to go his way, we call this a "controlling" type of personality. Jumbo wishes to join the warm Red glow of the Brady Bunch. Little does Jumbo realize is his fancy BAR (Bolt-Action Rifle) will soon be renamed a "High-Powered Sniper Rifle" and his fancy $6K (which he most likely got as a gift for writing a review for the company) shotgun will be renamed a "Short Barrelled Street Sweeper". Jumbo doesn't realize that when these power hungry, goose-stepping, greedy sons of bitches get a hold of my guns (because they are effective in keeping such tyrants in their place) they'll be coming after his. Or maybe he believes selling out the rest of us will earn him brownie (I can imagine him imitating Homer Simpson in showing his delight of the bakery good) points with Hitl..I mean Hillary.
If you love your freedom, your liberty, your right to tell tyrant and thug alike "NO!", then join me and everyone else in BOYCOTTING everything associated with Jumbo. In short, Jumbo, go
fuck yourself.
Don't believe my accusations? Go here http://outdoorlife.blogs.com/zumbo/2007/02/assault_rifles_.html and see for yourself!
Jumbo is my nickname for the portly hunter who probably makes more than I do in a year for each of his blathering. It's easy to criticize the working American like me who prefers such weapons when they are cheaper, more reliable, versatile, ergonomic, etc. compared to some expensive bolt-action that can't be jarred to hard. Jumbo sure likes things to go his way, we call this a "controlling" type of personality. Jumbo wishes to join the warm Red glow of the Brady Bunch. Little does Jumbo realize is his fancy BAR (Bolt-Action Rifle) will soon be renamed a "High-Powered Sniper Rifle" and his fancy $6K (which he most likely got as a gift for writing a review for the company) shotgun will be renamed a "Short Barrelled Street Sweeper". Jumbo doesn't realize that when these power hungry, goose-stepping, greedy sons of bitches get a hold of my guns (because they are effective in keeping such tyrants in their place) they'll be coming after his. Or maybe he believes selling out the rest of us will earn him brownie (I can imagine him imitating Homer Simpson in showing his delight of the bakery good) points with Hitl..I mean Hillary.
If you love your freedom, your liberty, your right to tell tyrant and thug alike "NO!", then join me and everyone else in BOYCOTTING everything associated with Jumbo. In short, Jumbo, go
fuck yourself.
Don't believe my accusations? Go here http://outdoorlife.blogs.com/zumbo/2007/02/assault_rifles_.html and see for yourself!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)